Role of Radiotherapy and Hormone Therapy in Patients with Node-Positive Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

New-generation imaging techniques and the increasing use of surgery in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) allow usto detect many cases of nodal disease at initial diagnosis or after resection. The treatment of PCa with pathologic regional nodeshas evolved from the exclusive use of systemic therapy to its combination with locoregional treatment. It can also represent abenefit in the overall survival. However, the evidence from randomised studies is limited. Thus, we review the most relevantresults in this scenario.Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical-Trials.gov and Webof Science on January 2023 to review node-positive PCa by considering the relevant literature on this topic published with norestrictions on date and language. The search keywords used were “Prostatic Neoplasms” (MeSh) and “Node-positive” (TextWord) and “Radiotherapy” (MeSh) and (“Androgen Antagonists” (MeSh) or “Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal” (MeSh)), whichare indexed within the Medical Subject Headings database.Results: The management of node-positive PCa has no clear definitive consensus at the initial disease diagnosis or after surgery.However, in this review, we summarise the existing literature for the management of these patients in both scenarios, consideringimaging tests, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and second-generation hormonal treatments.Conclusions: The combination of radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy is the treatment of choice. The addition ofsecond-generation hormone therapy, plus the intensification of radiotherapy schedules, will likely change the treatment paradigm for these patients. (AU)

Role of Radiotherapy and Hormone Therapy in Patients with Node-Positive Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: New-generation imaging techniques and the increasing use of surgery in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) allow us to detect many cases of nodal disease at initial diagnosis or after resection. The treatment of PCa with pathologic regional nodes has evolved from the exclusive use of systemic therapy to its combination with locoregional treatment. It can also represent a benefit in the overall survival. However, the evidence from randomised studies is limited. Thus, we review the most relevant results in this scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical-Trials.gov and Web of Science on January 2023 to review node-positive PCa by considering the relevant literature on this topic published with no restrictions on date and language. The search keywords used were "Prostatic Neoplasms" (MeSh) and "Node-positive" (Text Word) and "Radiotherapy" (MeSh) and ("Androgen Antagonists" (MeSh) or "Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal" (MeSh)), which are indexed within the Medical Subject Headings database. RESULTS: The management of node-positive PCa has no clear definitive consensus at the initial disease diagnosis or after surgery. However, in this review, we summarise the existing literature for the management of these patients in both scenarios, considering imaging tests, radiotherapy, hormone therapy and second-generation hormonal treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy is the treatment of choice. The addition of second-generation hormone therapy, plus the intensification of radiotherapy schedules, will likely change the treatment paradigm for these patients.

Current treatment landscape for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

The management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has undergone major changes in recent years. On the one hand, improved sensitivity of diagnostic tests, both radiological and endoscopic, has altered the way patients are staged. On the other hand, the arrival of new drugs with antitumoral activity, such as targeted therapies or immunotherapy, has changed the prognosis of patients, improving disease control and prolonging survival. Finally, the development of radiotherapy and surgical and interventional radiology techniques means that radical ablative treatments can be performed on metastases in any location in the body. All of these advances have impacted the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer, especially in a subgroup of these patients in which all of these treatment modalities converge. This poses a challenge for physicians who must decide upon the best treatment strategy for each patient, without solid evidence for one optimal mode of treatment in this patient population. The aim of this article is to review, from a practical and multidisciplinary perspective, published evidence on the management of oligometastatic NSCLC patients. We evaluate the different alternatives for radical ablative treatments, the role of primary tumor resection or radiation, the impact of systemic treatments, and the therapeutic sequence. In short, the present document aims to provide clinicians with a practical guide for the treatment of oligometastatic patients in routine clinical practice.

Bone health and therapeutic agents in advanced prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most frequent genitourinary tumor worldwide. Maintaining an optimum bone health throughout the natural course of prostate cancer is an important aspect in the management of this disease, particularly in this at risk population of older and frail patients who experience bone loss related to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or patients who develop bone metastases. The number of treatment options for advanced prostate cancer that combine ADT with docetaxel, new hormonal agents and/or radiotherapy has increased substantially in recent years. Bisphosphonates and other bone targeted agents such as denosumab have shown an improvement in bone mineral density and are suited for patients with treatment-related osteoporosis and/or bone metastases with an increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). In this context, the aim of this review is to analyse key aspects of bone health and therapies that can prevent the occurrence of SREs throughout the clinical course of prostate cancer, and how to combine them with new available treatments in this setting.

GOECP/SEOR clinical guidelines on radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence. Palliative care is common in MPM as radical treatment with curative intent is often not possible due to metastasis or extensive locoregional involvement. Numerous therapeutic advances have been made in recent years, including the use of less aggressive surgical techniques associated with lower morbidity and mortality (e.g., pleurectomy/decortication), technological advancements in the field of radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, proton therapy), and developments in systemic therapies (chemotherapy and immunotherapy). These improvements have had as yet only a modest effect on local control and survival. Advances in the management of MPM and standardization of care are hampered by the evidence to date, limited by high heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes. In this clinical guideline prepared by the oncological group for the study of lung cancer of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, we review clinical, histologic, and therapeutic aspects of MPM, with a particular focus on all aspects relating to radiotherapy, including the current evidence base, associations with chemotherapy and surgery, treatment volumes and planning, technological advances, and reradiation.

Current role of nanoparticles in the treatment of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. Nevertheless, new therapeutic agents have been developed to treat lung cancer that could change this mortality-rate. Interestingly, incredible advances have occurred in recent years in the development and application of nanotechnology in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. AIM: Nanoparticles (NPs) have the ability to incorporate multiple drugs and targeting agents and therefore lead to an improved bioavailability, sustained delivery, solubility, and intestinal absorption. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This review briefly summarizes the latest innovations in therapeutic nanomedicine in lung cancer with examples on magnetic, lipid, and polymer NP. Emphasis will be placed on future studies and ongoing clinical trials in this field.

Metformin and statins: a possible role in high-risk prostate cancer.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that statins and oral anti-diabetic drugs, such as metformin, can have a favorable role in advanced prostate cancer treatment.Metformin has been shown to inhibit proliferation of tumor cells in vitro and statins inhibit carcinogenesis by suppressing angiogenesis/invasion mechanisms. However, clinical evidence on the protective effect of these drugs is still weak.The purpose of this study is to analyze if these drugs have an impact on Biochemical-Failure-Free-Survival (BFFS) and on Distant-Failure-Free-Survival (DFFS) in localized high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2002-2016, 447 patients with histologically confirmed high-risk prostate cancer were retrospectively evaluated. All patients received radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Biochemical recurrence was determined by the Phoenix criteria and metastatic patients were defined by the presence of radiological metastasis. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 175 patients were treated with statins (65.3 % with a dose ≤ 20 mg/day) and 70 with metformin (75.7 % with a dose ≤ 1700 mg/day). Median follow-up was 88 months (1-194) with no differences in BFFS and DFFS between metformin and non-metformin patients (77.4 % versus 80 %, p = 0.91 and 89.4 % versus 88.7 %, p = 0.56, respectively). We did not find a statistical difference in BFFS and DFFS in patients taking higher doses of those drugs. CONCLUSION: Metformin and statins were not associated with BFFS or DFFS improvement in our analysis. However, the small number of patients treated with these drugs limits the reliability of the results and prospective studies are needed.